There is a minor factual error in “What is Codeberg?”. The third paragraph states that Codeberg is not a corporation. Well actually …, Codeberg as a “eingetragener Verein” (German for “registered association” or “incorporated association”) very much *is* a corporation. And so, that part of the sentence has either to be removed or at least has to be qualified in some way. This commit does the latter.
a bunch of (typo) fixes, additions, rewordings
Update references
- remove mentions of the master branch, as it's removed for many repos
and might change in the future for others (fixes some dead links)
- remove mentions of moved repos with our official examples
- some on-the-fly additions or rewordings
Close#186 foobar->examples
Co-authored-by: fnetx <git@fralix.ovh>
Co-authored-by: fnetX <git@fralix.ovh>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Documentation/pulls/189
Co-authored-by: Otto Richter <fnetx@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Otto Richter <fnetx@noreply.codeberg.org>
Looking of course for feedback on this, as I am not an expert on this at
all. This does capture some of the questions I had when starting to look
into licensing.
In Codeberg/Design #39 the idea was thrown around to put some links
under a new dropdown and prominently link to the docs instead.
This rewrites the docs index page and adds some more information on how
to get started, as well as adds some other tweaks to **communication
methods** and gives a new explanation of **what Codeberg is**.
Co-authored-by: fnetX <git@fralix.ovh>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Documentation/pulls/158
Co-authored-by: Otto Richter <fnetx@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Otto Richter <fnetx@noreply.codeberg.org>
